Read: [next] [previous] messageRe: [Cdn-DMCA] Political contributionsFrom: Kristofer Coward <kris _-at-_ melon.org> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 07:41:52PM -0400, mskala@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kristofer Coward wrote: > > Any interest in scanning Hansard? Any interest in putting together a > > page where we can "keep score" for given politicians? Anyone interested > > in encouraging others to make contributions based on our assessments? > > I've been scanning all over Hansard since January, and noting the points I > find interesting in my web log at http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/lebwog.html . > Those aren't limited to copyright. Something that has occurred to me is > to create some kind of score card of different MPs and my thoughts on them > - I sometimes make comments like "so-and-so is my favourite MP at the > moment" but it might be interesting to formalize that. > > What if we had a database of all the MPs, and an interface allowing people > to add comments to individual MPs, including adding or subtracting points > representing status or approval? Some MP gets up to give a speech on > copyright, and I might add a comment saying "Made interesting point > re: blank media levy, +2 points". The site would be designed so readers > could look at all recent comments, or all comments on a given MP, and so > on, and it would keep track of the point totals, as "Matthew's opinion of > this MP", "Total of all members' opinions of this MP", "Total points for > this party", and so on. There would also be some kind of interface to > generate form letters - so that if I chose to participate in Kris's > campaign contribution scheme, I might say "Okay, I'll value my points at > $1 each" and then it would spit out an itemized list for each MP - "Dear > whoever, please find enclosed my cheque for $17, computed as > follows: such-and-such date, you did thus-and-so, $2, such-and-such date, > you did this-other-thing, $1, such-and-such date, you made this mistake, > subtract $1". Report quarterly, including their current rank among the various MPs, along with a reminder that come election time, the MP with the most points gets a big fat campaign contribution (whereas the MP with the lowest score gets a big fat negative publicity campaign). Of course, this means we also need to attract pledges to the "grand prize" winnres. > Such a site might encourage more people to pay attention to what's going > on in Parliament; it might also increase exposure for the opinions of In fact, it might become so effective that even the parliamentarians might consider paying attention :) > anyone who participated in the rating process; it might provide some > interesting feedback on public opinion; and so on. It would be desirable > to attract a lot of participation. A vague idea I have is that it might > be fun to build some kind of stock-market-simulation or betting-pool style > of game into it, to help encourage people to visit regularly, but I'm not > sure just how that would operate. Well for the attention, all we really need is mention on /. :) -- Kristofer Coward http://unripe.melon.org/ GPG Fingerprint: 2BF3 957D 310A FEEC 4733 830E 21A4 05C7 1FEB 12B3 -- For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and links to other related sites please see http://www.flora.org/dmca/ Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |