Read: [next] [previous] messageRe: [d@DCC] Are there "diff"s available for amendments?From: Andy Kaplan-Myrth <techlaw _-at-_ uottawa.ca> Russell McOrmond wrote: > I am wondering if software is the right first step, or trying to > collect the data is a better first step. I suspect the software will be > the easiest part of this project. > > > Publicly online we have the current copyright act, Bill C-60 (2005), > some smaller bills (Libraries and Archives, etc), and Bill C-32 (1997). > We don't have Bill C-60 (1988) or many of the other relevant bills > since 1921(or 1928, depending on whether you go by the bill date or the > passing date) which is our first Canadian copyright act (Before that we > were under the British act with confusing local amendments to deal with > the copyright rogue south of us). Since we do have Bills going back to 1997, we should consider handling the data in two phases -- what we have now to look at Bills going forward, and historical Bills and Acts to help with historical analysis of legislative change. No reason not to start with the current Copyright Act and Bill C-60 (2005), is there? Cheers, Andy -- Andy Kaplan-Myrth, M.A., LL.B. Manager, Law & Technology, University of Ottawa ------------------------------------------------ Faculty of Law : Faculté de droit University of Ottawa : Université d'Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Street Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada t. 613/562-5800 x3206 f. 613/562-5124 e. techlaw@uottawa.ca w: http://www.commonlaw.uottawa.ca/tech ------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@list.digital-copyright.ca http://list.digital-copyright.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |