Read: [next] [previous] message[d@DCC] Letter from office of Heritage Minister.From: Russell McOrmond <russell _-at-_ flora.ca> This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1950289362-816647935-1113530830=:14401 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504142211421.14401@calcutta.flora.ca> I typed the following from a letter I received in the mail. ---cut--- Dear Mr. McOrmond: I am writing in response to your correspondence of March 7, 2005, forwarded by Mr. David Mcguinty, Member of Parliament, to the Honourable Liza Frulla, Minister of Canadian Heritage and Minister responsible for Status of Women, regarding copyright policy development. Ms. Frulla appreciates being advised on your views and has noted your comments with respect to this matter. Your concerns relate to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) treaties on copyright, the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT). In December 1996, the WIPO Treaties were created at a Diplomatic Conference held in Geneva, Switzerland. In December 1997, Canada signed but did not ratify the Treaties. Since that time, the Treaties have come into force and currently there are 49 ratifications of the WCT and 46 ratifications of the WPPT. Some of Canada's major trading partners, including the United States of America and Japan, have ratified the Treaties. The European Union, which now comprises 25 countries, is in the process of introducing legislation that will allow all of its members to ratify the Treaties. In October 2002, the Government of Canada published a report entitled Supporting Culture and Innovation: Report on the Provisions and Operation of the Copyright Act. The report states that "The government of Canada is committed to bringing the Copyright Act in conformity with the WCT and WPPT once the issues involved are thoroughly analyzed and appropriately consulted upon." This document, also known as the Section 92 report, is available on-line at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/incrp-prda.nsf/en/rp00863e.html . ../2 Through analysis and in-depth consultations are essential to ensure that any legislation adopted will best serve the public interest of all Canadians. To this end, parliamentarians have the mandate and have had the opportunity to listen to interested stakeholder and to review the issues. In May 2004, following extensive consultations, the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage tabled its Interim Report on Copyright Reform. The report is available on-line by visiting the parliamentary Web site at http://www.parl.gc.ca/InfocomDoc/Documents/37/3/parlbus/commbus/house/reports/herip01-e.htm . The report includes a recommendation that Canada introduce the legislation necessary to ratify the WIPO Treaties. On November 3, 3004, the Standing Committee re-tabled this report which requires the Government of Canada to formally respond within 150 days. Please be assured that your continued active participation in the development of Canadian copyright law and policies is most welcome as it will help to ensure that the policies adopted remain in the best interest of all Canadians. I trust that this information is useful. Please accept my best wishes. Yours sincerely, Luc Rouleau Director Ministerial Correspondence Secretariat c.c.: The Honourable David Emerson, P.C., M.P. Mr. Charlie Angus, M.P. Mr. Paul Crête, M.P. Mr. Maka Kotto, M.P. Mr. Brian Masse, M.P. Mr. David McGuinty, M.P. Ms. Bev Oda, M.P. Mr. James Rajotte, M.P. ---cut--- Note: There was a typo in the message on the Heritage report which is actually at http://www.parl.gc.ca/infocomdoc/Documents/37/3/parlbus/commbus/house/reports/herirp01/herip01-e.htm I find the letter very form-letter like, so suspect other people have received very similar letters. It doesn't say anything, just repeating the same things we have been told many times already. This includes the almost-funny joke of calling what happened just prior to the Interim report "extensive consultations". I'm not sure what letter Mr. Rouleau is replying to that was dated March 7, but that may have been the date that Mr. McGuinty forwarded it to the Minister's office. This is a day before the March 8 press release from the security companies about the harm to innovation from with 1996 WIPO treaties. I'm drafting my reply at: http://www.digital-copyright.ca/scratchpad/index.php?ReplyMinister20050412-RWM I believe that it is appropriate for this letter to be a bit more aggressive than the ones in the past, given we are heading into an election and this will be on everyones mind. I will be copying the same people this letter was copied to, which includes the Heritage and Industry critics from the opposition parties. "From the above quote I must conclude that either the Minister is not aware of the facts of the case, or that she wishes to amend the copyright act such that the legacy recording industry would no longer need to provide evidence of wrongdoing in order to launch lawsuits against children. Is this really the message that the Minister and the Liberals wish to go to elections with?" -- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> http://www.digital-copyright.ca/blog/2 (My BLOG) Sign the Petition Users' Rights! http://digital-copyright.ca/petition/ To protect Internet age creativity we must reform WIPO, not copyright! ---1950289362-816647935-1113530830=:14401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@list.digital-copyright.ca http://list.digital-copyright.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss ---1950289362-816647935-1113530830=:14401-- Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |