Re: [d@DCC] Re: Government response to Heritage Committee Interim

From: Russell McOrmond <russell _-at-_ flora.ca>
To: General Copyright Discussions <discuss (at) list.digital-copyright.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:31:36 -0500 (EST)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503191355390.3127@calcutta.flora.ca> <20050319220155.GA15811@netdirect.ca>

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Chris Frey wrote:

> Do you have a neat summary to help other people "get it" as well?

My summary to the report:
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/node/view/550

Has my link to a story I wrote that discusses one of the issues:

The picture that may never again be possible
http://www.flora.ca/russell/drafts/puja-picture.html


   CIPPIC.ca wrote quite a bit about the expectations of consumers around 
commissioned photographs.  The hearings on bill S-9 are ideal for this, 
given this identical issue was introduces through the back-door via the 
Senate.

-- 
  Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
  http://www.digital-copyright.ca/blog/2 (My BLOG)
  Sign the Petition Users' Rights! http://digital-copyright.ca/petition/
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@list.digital-copyright.ca
http://list.digital-copyright.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss