Read: [next] [previous] messageRe: [d@DCC] A stab at writing to an MPFrom: Trevor Curtis <tcurtis _-at-_ somaradio.ca> Sorry. It would have probably made more sense to send the letter in the body of the email. Here it is: I am a musician, a programmer and an amateur photographer. Typically, much of my art work and software contributions are made available through my website, or through the websites of the parties to which I have contributed. With copyright issues making headlines in the news these days, I thought it important to educate myself on how these laws affect me, and my work. In my research I have found that there has been much movement on the part of the federal government to update laws to reflect the current “digital age”. This can be seen through the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage's Government Status Report on Copyright Reform. The recommendations of this report have raised some serious concerns in my mind about the direction of Canada's copyright laws. In the committee's report, there are recommendations to hold Internet Service Providers (ISPs) liable for copyright infringement if infringement has occurred through the use of their service. Though the recommendation (Recommendation 3) does exempt liability if the ISP acts as an intermediary “without actual or constructive knowledge of the transmitted content”, it is unclear what “constructive knowledge” implies. As a consumer of such services, I am fearful that if such a recommendation where to be accepted, ISPs would be forced to monitor my activities which would raise privacy concerns, and would most likely cost more as the additional cost of monitoring would likely be passed on to the consumer. For a country that prides itself on being on the forefront of the technological wave, this recommendation would have serious adverse affects. Another recommendation put forth by the committee was that material on the Internet is only considered public if it is “ accompanied by notice from the copyright owner explicitly consenting that the material can be used without prior payment or permission”. This means any material that is not accompanied by a notice relinquishing any rights is subject under normal copyright law. One of the many problems with this is that citizens from other countries will not be aware of Canadian copyright law and will not make the appropriate steps to ensure that material intended to be shared can be shared. In addition, most Canadians will most likely not be aware of the new laws regarding this issue, and may unknowingly break them. This brings up perhaps the biggest issue I see in this whole debate. The complexities of the recommended changes to the copyright law make it difficult for the average Canadian to understand the issues. As a result, it appears much of the opinions and input to the committee is from large special interest groups who wish to see more restrictions and changes to the benefit of the creators, and very little opinions or input from the perspective of the Canadian public. As it stands today, I believe Canadian copyright law successfully strikes a balance between the rights of creators and the rights of consumers. While I appreciate the government's willingness to stay current with the impacts of technology on the law, the direction of the committee's recommendations only go towards weakening the creator-consumer balance and put into deport the sharing, co-operation, and knowledge building that defines the Internet community and indeed Canada. -- Trevor Curtis http://www.somaradio.ca/~tcurtis _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@list.digital-copyright.ca http://list.digital-copyright.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |