Read: [next] [previous] messageRE: [d@DCC] Future CBC "the docket" on digital copyright.From: Russell McOrmond <russell _-at-_ flora.ca> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Chris Brand wrote: > Good luck - I expect it will be quite a challenge. It was a challenge. David Basskin seems to be a very polished and articulate lobbiest for the copyright extremists. A conversation with a government bureaucrat later in the afternoon confirmed this. He entirely dominated the conversation, not allowing Allison (the other guest - she and the host were in Halifax) or myself to get much of a word into the debate. I believe I fumbled the ball on the questions as I didn't realize who David really was until well into the very short debate. The question of "if someone downloads a piece of music from the Internet, is that wrong" is not a trivial yes/no answer. This is especially in light of the fact that the 'downloading' part seems to be covered by the Private Copying regime (IE: it is legal if the music is put onto a blank CD), and the 'uploading' part -- while illegal -- is still a non-commercial de minimis crime. The extremist privacy invasions into peoples homes and private lives required to enforce this de minimis crime greatly outweigh the severity of the crimes themself. I really believe that if folks like David were involved with transportation policy, he would be lobbying to break peoples legs to prevent them from jaywalking (and not waiting until they have ever jaywalked before doing so). David tried the rhetoric of suggesting that "Not authorized by copyright holder" == Infringement, which is simply false. He knows this is false, given he is also a spokesperson for the CPCC. I wish it wasn't such a short amount of time. I tried to get into the business models question (Not everyone wants royalty-only, all collected centrally through collective societies and other industry associations/intermediaries), but David yet again cut me off before I had a chance to explain that situation. > See if you can point out that Copyright law only expanded to include > reproduction because reproduction was expensive enough that it was only > reasonable to reproduce a work in order to publish it (which was covered > by Copyright). A very different world to the one we now find ourselves > in. I had a two-page cheat sheet I made based on the little documentary piece they will air before the debate and from things I researched typing the other guests names into Google. Before we went on the air I was told to put them away as it was too obvious I was looking at them ;-) I made barely 2 points of what I had written down, didn't get to mention any of the names I wanted to, etc. It was so short, and David completely took over the conversation. > Incidentally, in my conversations with co-workers and the like, > I find that very few people have any idea how long Copyright lasts. > Most expect it to be 10 or 20 years and are *very* surprised to > find that it lasts beyond the creators death. And David suggests that Canada is falling far behind the rest of the world (really, only the USA -- who is pushing their narrow vision through WIPO) based on his extremist interpretation of copyright. The only thing we all agreed on is that there needs to be more education on copyright. My goals are to get Canadians to get involved to change copyright to meet the needs of citizens, and David and Lesley want people to change to meet the desires of copyright extremists and special interest groups. BTW: Get ready to send in letters to the team at The Docket. I am hoping that they will do more on this topic, and include more guests from our community. http://cbc.ca/thedocket/ > Chris --- Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/> Any 'hardware assist' for communications, whether it be eye-glasses, VCR's, or personal computers, must be under the control of the citizen and not a third party. -- http://www.flora.ca/russell/ -- For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and links to other related sites please see http://www.digital-copyright.ca Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |