Read: [next] [previous] messageAustralian competition bureauFrom: Sandy Harris <sandy _-at-_ storm.ca> Some interesting quotes from the web pages of the Australian gov't competition Commission. http://www.accc.gov.au//fs-search.htm Searching for "DVD" I find two speeches: Difficulties between the pro-competitive community and Intellectual Property Mr Ross Jones Commissioner Australian Competition & Consumer Commission | Australian consumers are currently suffering from an international cartel that | restricts their access to digital versatile discs (DVDs). The cartel, headed | by major film studios in agreement with the manufacturers of DVD players, has | divided the world into regions. This ensures that DVDs on sale in Australia | will only function on a DVD player licensed for region 4 that includes Australia. | The stated aim is to protect cinema ticket sales by preventing people viewing | movies on DVDs in their homes before distribution to cinemas. The Australian | subsidiaries of US film companies have been requested by the Commission to | explain their actions. It will then decide what action can be taken. Globalisation and Competition Policy Professor Allan Fels Chairman Australian Competition & Consumer Commission | The Commission has requested the Australian subsidiaries of United States film | companies to explain why their regional restrictions on DVDs should not be deemed | a breach of the Trade Practices Act 1974. ... | | The Commission believes RPC is anti-competitive with Australian consumers lacking | a choice of DVD videos and possibly paying higher prices. [big snip] | The arrangement between the studios and between them and the manufacturers may | constitute a contract ... lessening competition in a market in contravention of | section 45 of the Trade Practices Act. | | The essential point here is that in the Commission’s view, there is an attempt | to use copyright laws for a purpose related to areas beyond their real purpose. | This coding system is a mechanism to allow price discrimination, not to protect | the inherent rights of Intellectual Property owners. I believe Chairman Fels has this exactly correct. The problem is indeed "an attempt to use copyright laws for a purpose related to areas beyond their real purpose". The solution, for us, is to carefully ensure that revised Canadian laws are carefully written to prevent such abuse. -- For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and links to other related sites please see http://www.flora.org/dmca/ Read: [next] [previous] message List: [newer] [older] articles You need to subscribe to post to this forum. |