Read: [next] [previous] message

Re: [d@DCC] Health privacy and license agreements

From: Ruben I Safir <ruben _-at-_ mrbrklyn.com>
To: General Discussion <discuss (at) digital-copyright.ca>
Cc: General Discussion <discuss -_at_- digital-copyright.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:09:20 -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0211212237170.4055-100000@diamond.ansuz.sooke.bc.ca> <200211220402.gAM427bD002465@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

This is non-sense.  Most *formal* reviews are no better, if they exist at all, than
the method of Free Software.




>   It may be somewhat *cheaper* because many other pieces may have been
> reviewed, but since very little open source has had *formal* reviews done by
> people who have well known qualifications, all of the code has to be looked
> at again.
> 
> 
-- 
__________________________
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
__________________________
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS http://fairuse.nylxs.com

http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting
http://www.inns.net <-- Happy Clients
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn....

1-718-382-0585
--
For (un)subscription information, posting guidelines and
links to other related sites please see http://www.digital-copyright.ca


Read: [next] [previous] message
List: [newer] [older] articles

You need to subscribe to post to this forum.
XML feed